The reason that there are so few NT’s on this forum is because @blake has decided to never stop typing donald trump as an ENTJ. This is so obviously inaccurate in the mind of any NT who approaches the article, that it does make it impossible for rational people to believe that the rest of the content is going to be any good.
It is such bad data that any time I recommend the forum to anybody, I have to actually deal with it. If I forget to mention it ahead of time, it comes up later.
I think it’s fine. If I didn’t I wouldn’t be here. But the Ti mind basically throws such a massive red flag that it does make it really really hard for someone who hasn’t already read some of the more valuable articles to understand what am I going to get out of this stuff or to estimate how much of it will I have to ignore?
Just something to think about. The question of whether or not Trump might actually be an ENTJ is, admittedly, not one I entertain. I’m not even interested in it. But I am getting bored of having to explain ENTJs to anybody who I send to the site.
Does it matter that there aren’t that many NTs?
Honestly, after I write this, here is my thought:
Whenever I engage with NTs on other forums I find it exhausting.
I’ve circled around to thinking that maybe being able to see past one data point that one finds to be totally impossible to buy might be a good litmus test for whether or not a person is of the right frame of mind for being a part of this forum anyway. Maybe it’s a good litmus test.
Obviously nobody should come here forever, obvsiously it isn’t for all of us all the time.
Anyway. Interesting litmus test. It’s a harder pill to swallow for NTs than the astrology, is my bet. But adding a lot of NTs would just be, hmm. Exhausting. Or does anybody disagree with that? Maybe more NTs would be exhausting to me, interesting to NFs here.